Article Number:
Article Title:	Do not use periods(.) or comma(,) in the Reviewer field
Reviewer:
Reviewer Email:
Reviewing Date:

 

Please check the appropriate number to describe your assessment regarding each of the following statements.  The numbers refers to: 

(1) strongly disagree, (2) moderately disagree, (3) moderately agree, (4) strongly agree.

 

A.       THE ARTICLE:

 

1          2           3          4          has sufficient amount of practical coverage

1          2           3          4          is theoretically sound

1          2           3          4          is supported by a logical and in-depth analysis

1          2           3          4          reflects awareness of current theory and previous research

1          2           3          4          is innovative

1          2           3          4          is appropriate for the SAM AMJ or SAM MIP audience

1          2           3          4          covers an important topic

1          2           3          4          is timely

B.       THE WRITING STYLE IS:

 

        clear

        concise

        interesting

        grammatically correct

C.       BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE THE KEY IDEAS/CONCLUSIONS THAT CAN BE DRAWN
           FROM THIS ARTICLE

D.       MY OVERALL EVALUATION OF THE ARTICLE IS:

          EXCELLENT        

          GOOD    

          FAIR

          POOR

         THE ARTICLE IS MORE SUITABLE FOR:

          AMJ        

          AND I . . .  

       RECOMMEND IT FOR PUBLICATION IN PRESENT FORM

       RECOMMEND PUBLICATION WITH MODIFICATIONS

       DO NOT RECOMMEND IT FOR PUBLICATION

PLEASE SPECIFY THE REASONS FOR YOUR RECOMMENDATION: 

COMMENTS/SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS: 

COMMENTS FOR THE EDITOR ONLY: 
(Comments entered in the field below will only be viewed by the AMJ Editor and will not be shared with the author.)